Which concept suggests that punishment should be sufficient to deter a specific offense?

The concept that suggests punishment should be sufficient to deter a specific offense is specific deterrence. This theory focuses on preventing the individual offender from committing future crimes by imposing consequences that are tailored to their behavior. The goal is to make the individual recognize the risks and repercussions associated with their actions, thereby dissuading them from reoffending.

Specific deterrence operates on the premise that individuals can learn from their experiences with punishment. By experiencing a consequence that is meaningful and relevant to their specific offense, the individual is encouraged to avoid similar behavior in the future. This contrasts with other concepts like general deterrence, which seeks to deter the overall population from committing crimes by establishing a broader notion of legal consequences. The details of individual motivations and personal circumstances are crucial for specific deterrence, as the impact of punishment can vary significantly based on the offender's background and mindset.

Choice theory and free will, on the other hand, emphasize the ability of individuals to make rational choices and decisions regarding their behavior, but they do not specifically address the tailored nature of punishment aimed at deterring particular offenses. Thus, specific deterrence is essential in understanding how legal repercussions can influence an individual's future conduct.